Dear editor:

I am appalled over the actions the Rockport City Council appeared ready to take in reaction to the certified petition that resulted in having the $20.75M CO bond added to the May election allowing Rockport citizens a vote.

The Council has an agenda item on Monday’s (8/30) special meeting to issue an ordinance for municipal debt that is paid off by tax revenues. They are saying this method is justified because the $14.72M is required immediately to construct the new City Hall ($11.77M), address drainage issues ($2.3M) and purchase easements for the Key Allegro Bridge ($.65M) due to Hurricane Harvey.

I was fortunate to serve as an elected town councilman for four years in the Dallas area and understand the position requires making tough decisions. I was never able to make everyone happy all the time, but I did vote my conscience. In this case, my conscience would not be at ease saying the City Hall is an emergency.

Major expenditures such as a City Hall should never be considered emergency spending or done outside normal approval processes; the City can continue to function in current buildings until funds are approved via a bond election in May. Issuing funds for the bridge and drainage projects is something that could be construed as an emergency; utilizing Tax Notes for these two projects ($2.95M) is a Council action I support. Utilizing a Tax Note to replace the City Hall as an emergency is a gross misuse of the elected officials’ power.

Kathy Kane

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.